I have just returned from the 34th MD308 Leo Forum. Over 1,000 Leos (together with more than 50 Lions & Faculty Advisors) from Malaysia and Singapore converged for three days in Penang. The forum, graced by the Chief Minister of Penang at the opening, had two dynamic speakers: Dato Lawrence Chan (of PDL fame) and Mr Billi Lim (of Dare to Fail). Their presentations were relevant not only to the young delegates but to all present as they touched on continuing to love ourselves and to love others, and that the ability to bounce back from failure is more important than success. Dr Ben C Ng and I were privileged to be involved as speakers for the school for key officers.
Among the programs were the award presentations by respective Districts. It was a delight to see the happy faces of the young leaders receiving an appreciation for their hard work over the year. The forum also highlighted the fact that we have trained so many young people to continue our heritage of service but will lose them over the next few years. More concrete steps are needed to retain Alpha Leos through Omega clubs, and from Omega Leos to Lions and Lioness clubs. Sad...
While it is never easy to organize a major event for more than a thousand persons, here is one organized by a group of young people for other young people. Not only was it so, it was carried out by Leo leaders coming from as far as Klang Valley, Ipoh and Alor Setar with the majority from Penang. Inexperienced showed, mistakes were made, oversights and miscommunication happened. But these happen even in professional and international-standard events. Therefore, it is important to keep a LEO objective in mind: organizing the event provided opportunities to learn leadership skills and gain experience. I was happy to note so many positive responses from the Leos I worked with over the last three months: the gratitude for lessons learned, appreciation for the finer points of Lionism & life, and great relief when overcoming fears of failure and disappointment.
I hope some of those involved would have learned about 'master of ceremony' (pengerusi majlis) which is different from 'compere' (juru-acara) where there is already a presiding officer (pengerusi majlis); Lions protocol (including speech, seating, recognition, even attire) is different from government or other protocol; 'fellow' is used for someone in the same grouping (e.g. as a Leo, you can say 'fellow Leos' other Leos but not 'fellow Lions' to Lions); 'review meeting' is very different from 'post-mortem' (after-death: where you have to find out what caused the person [or forum] to die - it did not!!); among other nuggets of knowledge that comes from a thirst to know.
Obviously, there were some complains, but what irked me was the high-handed manner some of the complainers used. So what if you had paid for the forum: five-star treatment? The whole show was put together by volunteers who gave not only their energy but time and money to make others happy. The same applies for Lions conventions. In an earlier blog, I mentioned about professionalism so I am not giving the organizers excuses for falling short in certain areas. If a Leo failed in his/her duty, I am sure he/she would have realized and regretted the mistake and would learn from it. What I am certain is that most, if not all, these organizing Leos had sacrificed greatly to make the forum a success. They absolutely deserve our cheers not jeers!
On the other side of the fence, one of the complains the organizers had was about Lions, especially 'leaders' who walk in as if they are 'entitled' to benefits and privileges because they are a Lion or because of their position. While registration can still be done up to the opening of the forum, it has become a habit of Lions who did not care to register earlier or simply will not do so! The Forum Organizing Committee had foreseen this and set the policy of recognizing and seating only those who registered. It was agreed that latecomers and non-registrants, no matter how high their ranking, will simply have to be left out. But when it came time to act, 'face' had to be considered and some quarters given. Yet these very people did not appreciate all the efforts required by the Leo-in-charge to set (and reset) the seating and address according to protocol!
And there's the one about not being informed (i.e. time, venue, attire etc). As adults, I believe we have all the faculties on us and facilities around us to find out. With all the busyness of the committee members, it is simply an impossible task to call every Lion to remind him/her about every detail. Do not expect to be spoon-fed! The onus is on the attendee to ask if unsure (as did the vast majority).
As such, when complaining, please be fair: for the young people, this is part of an ongoing learning process. And be professional too in criticizing: highlight areas for improvement by giving positive solutions - don't just criticize or scold because personal expectations were not met, if an ego was bruised, or when no solution is possible. And if it is something beyond the control of the organizers, don't blame them! Except when there is need for autocratic authority or discipline (e.g. Leos getting out of hand), shouting at the Leos in public over a simple miscommunication issue does them no justice. Neither will threatening the Forum Advisors, District Governor or Council Chairperson!
Sadly, I often hear of adults (and worse still, Lions) doing just that!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hi Lion Anthony,
It's indeed great to see Lions like you acknowledging the need to eliminate "VIP treatments" especially in voluntary organizations. I strongly support the idea that everyone should be treated equal. Also, Leo members irregardless of experience levels and capabilities should be treated with care and groomed as leaders without needing to be shouted at.
Also, it is very important for us to understand that in any Leo Forum, the delegates are the VIP; not the organizing committee or dignitaries. Therefore, they should always be given priority and treated with outmost respect. Whenever situation goes out of control, the blame always remains with the organizing committee members and not the delegates. Therefore, we've got no reasons to feel frustrated with delegates.
On a separate note, I was giving some thoughts about the point you noted regarding "review meeting" and "post mortem" and felt that it remains appropriate to use the term "post mortem" irregardless of success of projects.
:: Post Mortem = after death
:: When a person dies of natural cause it still dies (life ends)
:: When a project completes the life of project ends too
:: Post Mortem is to determine if it was natural death or any other causes
:: Therefore, a post mortem after projects determine if the project died of natural death (successfully completed thus ended) or abnormal scenarios (any scenarios that caused it to be called off prematurely)
:: Post Mortem also determines if there are any viruses (issues to take note of and learning points) even when it was a natural death.
That's just my personal opinion and intepretation. What do you think?
The police will issue a 'postmortem' requisition in the case of suspicious death or death by misadventure. No postmortem is required in death by natural causes.
While there is no hard & fast rule what you should call the meeting, let's be positive in educating and raising Lions and Leos (or for that matter in work and life). To assign a negative factor to a successful project is to be dampen the enthusiasm & spirit of the guys who put in the hard work.
Post a Comment